Peec AI is built for teams that want a large, fully custom prompt set, and it has a loyal following among European marketing teams. The three things buyers check before committing to it are Claude coverage, a per-answer evidence log, and whether a plan tells you what to fix, not just where you stand.
The two things that send a Peec AI buyer looking elsewhere are Claude coverage and evidence depth. Peec's entry tier covers three models drawn from a pool of ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, AI Overviews, Copilot and Gemini, and Claude is not part of that published list, so a company whose buyers lean on Claude starts with a blind spot. The other gap is depth: Peec shows a visibility percentage and the sources cited per prompt, which is more than a bare score, but it stops short of a full per-answer log you can hand to a writer and say "fix this sentence."
Bottom line: if Claude answers matter for your buyers, or you want to open the exact sentence that cost you a mention, these are the two questions to ask before renewing.
Our full ranking, the 10 best AI visibility tools in 2026, covers ten vendors in depth. Here is how the tools a Peec AI buyer compares most often stack up side by side:
| Tool | Engines measured | How answers are shown | Free tier | Starting price | Who it fits |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peec AI | 3 of 6 models per plan, from a pool of ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, AI Overviews, Copilot and Gemini; Claude not listed | Visibility % + cited sources per prompt | Free trial only | see vendor pricing page | Teams that want to build a large, custom prompt set |
| Profound | ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Overviews on the trial; Claude and others on higher tiers | Composite scores; agent-run credits | No ongoing free plan (one-time trial) | see vendor pricing page | Enterprise teams wanting agent-level analytics |
| Otterly.AI | ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, Copilot on Lite; Claude/Gemini paid add-ons | Mentions + cited sources | Free trial only | see vendor pricing page | Solo marketers, smallest budget |
| Semrush AI Toolkit | ChatGPT, Google AI, Gemini, Perplexity, no Claude | Share of voice + sentiment | No standalone free tier | see vendor pricing page | SEO teams already paying for Semrush |
| Ahrefs Brand Radar | Sold per engine index, up to 6 | Mentions / share of voice | No (comes with free Ahrefs account) | see vendor pricing page | Teams that want AI share of voice next to Ahrefs SEO data |
| Reflexa | ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity | Raw AI answer + sources attached to every finding | Yes, first check free, no card, ~3 min | $49/mo | Teams that want a measurement they can defend, not a black-box score |
Proof: engine and evidence details above reflect each vendor's own published tier information as surveyed in our wider 10 best AI visibility tools ranking, September 2026. This run could not reach the vendors' own pricing pages (network blocked), so prices are left to the vendor's own page rather than guessed or copied from a review site. Reflexa's price is published on our own pricing page.
Note: engines listed are each vendor's own published tier limits, not a claim about what they technically can query; a higher tier usually unlocks more.
Peec AI and Profound sit at opposite ends of the same decision. Peec is prompt-first: you write and own a large, fully custom prompt set, and the tool tracks exactly those questions. Profound goes deeper on enterprise analytics and an agent-traffic view of AI crawlers hitting your site, at an enterprise price shape, with a wider set of engines unlocked on its higher tiers.
Pick by workflow: Peec AI for a team that wants to hand-write and own a large prompt set at a lower price point; Profound for an analytics team with an enterprise budget and a need for agent-traffic data.
Reflexa is the one in this comparison that attaches the complete AI answer and its sources to every finding, per engine. Peec AI goes a step further than a bare percentage by showing which sources an engine cited for a given prompt, which is useful, but it stops at the source list rather than a full answer-by-answer log the way Reflexa's public AI Visibility Index does. Profound, Otterly.AI, Semrush AI Toolkit and Ahrefs Brand Radar each report a score, a percentage or a share-of-voice figure as the primary output.
Why it matters: you cannot fix an answer you cannot read. A score tells you that you are losing; the raw answer tells you which sentence, which competitor and which source cost you the mention.
We asked ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity 100 real buyer questions about AI visibility tools in September 2026 and counted the names in all 300 answers. This is the same kind of measurement these tools sell, run on their own category:
| Tool | Answers naming it (of 300) |
|---|---|
| Profound | 94 |
| Semrush | 67 |
| Otterly.AI | 49 |
| Peec AI | 49 |
| Ahrefs | 39 |
| SE Ranking | 21 |
| Scrunch AI | 19 |
Proof: Reflexa AI Visibility Index, September 2026 (100 buyer questions about AI visibility tools, 3 engines, 300 observed answers, counted by name).
Read it as rank, not market share: 49 of 300 is roughly one in six answers, tied with Otterly.AI and behind Profound and Semrush, not a crowd favorite.
You can shortlist a Peec AI alternative without buying anything yet:
Reflexa, Profound, Otterly.AI, Semrush AI Toolkit and Ahrefs Brand Radar are the tools buyers compare Peec AI against most often. Which one fits depends on whether you need Claude coverage, a per-answer evidence log, or an existing SEO subscription to extend.
It depends on workflow and budget, not a single winner. Peec AI is built around a large, self-defined prompt set at a lower price point; Profound goes deeper on enterprise analytics and agent-traffic tracking at an enterprise price, and some teams run a lighter tracker alongside it rather than choosing one.
Peec AI's published model pool for its entry tier draws three models from a set that includes ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, AI Overviews, Copilot and Gemini; Claude is not named among them. Model lists change, so confirm the current one on Peec's own pricing page before you build a prompt set around it.
Reflexa attaches the full raw AI answer and its sources to every finding, for ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity. Peec AI shows which sources an engine cited for a given prompt, which is useful, but it does not publish a complete answer-by-answer evidence log the way Reflexa does.
Reflexa's first check is free, no card required, and takes minutes. Confirm Peec AI's and Otterly.AI's current entry prices on their own pricing pages, since self-serve tiers in this category change often.
The free check reads your pages the way ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity read them — 23 structural checks, evidence attached, no card needed.